Skip to main content

1994 Vancouver Canucks: One Last Look Back At 1994

The following is an excerpt from my unreleased book: Remembering The 1994 Vancouver Canucks. Please see below for the full table of contents.

June 15th, 2011

With the score knotted at two, the Boston Bruins and Vancouver Canucks faceoff to start overtime in game two of the 2011 Stanley Cup Final.Off the opening faceoff Daniel Sedin quickly dumps the puck into the Boston zone. The diminutive Alex Burrows zooms in on the puck, somehow beating out the long reach of the giant defenseman Zdeno Chara. Burrows bursts behind the net, scoring a rare wraparound goal just 11 seconds into overtime! The goal gives the Canucks a 2-0 series lead. They only need 2 wins in the next 5 games to finally become Stanley Cup champions!

I vividly remember the Burrows winning goal in game 2. For the first time that entire Stanley Cup playoffs I allowed myself to think “this is really happening.” “The Canucks are going to do this.” “That was a goal of destiny – the Canucks are destined to win the Stanley Cup!”

That was a rare feeling in the spring of 2011. For the first time ever the Canucks were truly Stanley Cup contenders – favorites even, in the eyes of many. But I never enjoyed a moment of it.

When the same Alex Burrows “slayed the dragon” in the Chicago series I let out a horrendous scream of relief that scared my girlfriend’s dog for the rest of the night. The worst part is no one could tell if the Canucks had won or lost based solely on my exasperation. I was secluded in the basement and my primal urge was one of relief and exasperation more than joy or celebration. I sat downstairs for probably 20 minutes, completely exhausted, before emerging to go for a long walk by myself. Remember, the dog was
scared of me.

So was everyone. I was scared of me. I continued to be scared of me the rest of the 2011 Stanley Cup playoffs.  The Canucks knocked off Nashville and San Jose, but I continued to be a wreck. I was a wreck until Burrows quick overtime goal against Boston in game 2.

With that win and the seemingly commanding series lead, I decided I needed to try and actually enjoy what was going on. For the life of me I could not understand why I enjoyed that ride so little. I still do not comprehend it. But that night I sat back content and proud.

Oddly my thoughts quickly drifted from Henrik and Daniel, Kesler and Burrows, Louie and Vigneault back all the years before when it was so tough to be a Canucks fan. King Richard Brodeur. Stan Smyl. Harold Snepsts. And of course my thoughts quickly came back to 1994. Back to Trevor Linden and Pavel Bure, Kirk McLean’s save against Calgary and Greg Adams! Greg Adams! It truly was the best of times. A Vancouver Stanley Cup championship in 2011 would be for those guys as much as the current group, I decided. That made me happy.

That is also when I realized even if the Canucks had won the Stanley Cup in 2011, it wasn’t the same. I had not enjoyed almost any of the 2011 run because I was full of apprehension. I wanted more badly than ever to win that damned Stanley Cup, just so I could feel relief. I can’t imagine what the players must have been feeling.

It was different back in 1994. Maybe it was my more youthful (naïve?) way back then. But I enjoyed every step of the way. I didn’t enjoy 2011 at all, except for the first few moments after that Burrows OT goal.

That’s when I realized that nothing would ever replace the 1994 Vancouver Canucks in this fan’s heart. I suspect many fans of that era can say the same. And truth be told, as much as I wanted to see Trevor Linden hoist the Stanley Cup and pass it around to McLean, to Bure, to Ronning, to Quinn . . .  I wouldn’t change a thing. Not even the ending.

Of course, somehow, the Canucks failed to finish the job in 2011. I still do not understand what happened. I still have not gone back to revisit it, and I likely never really will. I swear to god that when I die I want the Vancouver Canucks to be my pall bearers so they can let me down one last time. The Canucks always let me down, except for in 1994.

I had a definite suspicion that the 2011 playoffs would change me somehow. I had no real idea how at the time. But I guess part of me knew I had to take a break from hockey, at least for some period of time. I needed to be allowed to let go from my own self-imposed binds. A Stanley Cup championship would have so nicely allowed me that freedom. I simply could not go through the heartache again.

The 2011 playoffs was supposed to be the crescendo of my fandom. I was truly cemented as a Canucks fan forever following their terrific 1994 Stanley Cup final run. Even though that team, too, lost in game 7, I would never go back and change a thing. However, I was really hoping the 2011 team would complete the saga, finally winning the Stanley Cup and ending the story. That would allow me to move on with a great deal of satisfaction. I badly needed that sense of completion.

Of course, the 2011 team did not win. Despite being a superior team to that of 1994, these Canucks, felled by injuries, questionable refereeing and Boston's penalty kill, also lost the Stanley Cup in game 7. But this time, despite an incredible season, the only lasting feeling is that of disappointment.

At least we will always have 1994, right Canucks fans?

June 11th/14th, 1994 - The Highs, The Lows

Bure-ing The Flames
The Russian Rocket
Captain Kirk

Shooting Down The Stars
The Elbow
The Mighty Pat Quinn
Cliff Ronning: The Little Man That Could

Be-Leaf It Or Not!
Forever A Canuck: Trevor Linden
Greg Adams! Greg Adams!

New York: All The World Is A Stage
The Penalty Shot
Nathan Lafayette And That Damn Goal Post
What A Mess!
Doug Lidster: The Lone Ranger
It Was A Riot!

June 15th, 2011: Looking Back At 1994


Popular posts from this blog

100 Greatest Hockey Players Of All Time

What follows is a listing of the 100 greatest hockey players of all time, in my opinion. As discussed earlier, the definition of greatness is a very personalized endeavor and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
While there is no way of ever truly ranking the top 100 definitively, it is important for the creators of such lists to be open and transparent of how the came to their conclusions. That accountability allows the reader to better understand the process. 

Although admittedly I'm using a completely unscientific formula, I weigh career achievements (era statistics, awards, championships) and legacy (impact on and off ice, peak dominance) equally high. I rank player ability as the third most important ingredient, as first and foremost as a tie breaker. Hence, I'm not necessarily looking for the better player, as in text book definitions of what a hockey player should be, but for players with the greatest careers and greatest legacies. Therefore the best player is not n…

Top Ten Junior Players Of All Time

Let's take a look at the Top Ten junior players of all time. For the purposes of this list we will at players in the WHL, OHL and QMJHL only.

10. Pat Lafontaine, Verdun, QMJHL Rookie-record 104 goals, 234 points in 1982-83; major junior player of the year.

9. Denis Potvin, Ottawa, OHL 254 games, 95 goals, 234 assists, 329 points. Broke Bobby Orr's junior records.

8. John Tavares, Oshawa, OHL 215 goals, 433 points in 247 games; most goals in OHL history; eligibility rules changed to admit him at 15; 2006 major junior rookie of the year, 2007 major junior player of the year; two world juniors, named 2009 all-star, top forward and MVP.

7. Sidney Crosby, Rimouski, QMJHL 120 goals, 303 points in 121 games; two-time major junior player of the year; silver and gold with Canada at two world juniors.

6. Eric Lindros, Oshawa, OHL 97 goals, 216 points in 95 games; one Memorial Cup victory; three world junior tournaments; major junior player of the year in 1991.

5. Mike Bossy, Laval, Q…

Greatest Hockey Legends: M