Skip to main content

Pucks On The 'Net: Seen Stamkos?


Some thoughts on the Stanley Cup Final after game five:
  • Oh that Seen Stamkos? line is starting to get a lot of use. For those who do not know that was the name of  advertising blitz back in 2008 used by the Tampa Bay Lightning when they first drafted Steven Stamkos. Now it's being used to ask why has Steven Stamkos been so quiet in the Stanley Cup final. Just one assist through five games against Chicago. Though his ice time is now spiking he only managed one shot on net in game five. With the support scoring line decimated by injuries, the Bolts really need Stamkos to find the back of the net. But Chicago has done a really good job keying on the dangerous sniper.
  • Chicago still doesn't look like Chicago, to me. They are clearly affected by the fatiguing blue line that limits their offensive push and usual swagger. But I also wonder how much of their leveled off play has to do with just how good the Tampa Bay Lightning are. I know I have not given the Lightning enough credit, and neither do a lot of people.
  • Not that this series is over by any means. Check out how close this series is: Goals: CHI 11, TB 10. Shots on goal: CHI 136, TB 136. Shot attempts: CHI 269, TB 266. It doesn't get much tighter than that. In fact, for the first time in NHL history, there has not been a multi-goal lead at any point in the opening 5 games of the Stanley Cup Final. That is truly amazing.
  • Lightning fans may remember back in 2004 falling behind 3 games to 2 to the Calgary Flames in the Stanley Cup final. Tampa came back to win the Stanley Cup, of course.
  • However the odds remain in Chicago's favor now. Since 1939, the team that has won Game 5 after a 2-2 split in the Final has won Stanley Cup 16 of 23 times (69.6%).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

100 Greatest Hockey Players Of All Time

What follows is a listing of the 100 greatest hockey players of all time, in my opinion. As discussed earlier, the definition of greatness is a very personalized endeavor and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
While there is no way of ever truly ranking the top 100 definitively, it is important for the creators of such lists to be open and transparent of how the came to their conclusions. That accountability allows the reader to better understand the process. 

Although admittedly I'm using a completely unscientific formula, I weigh career achievements (era statistics, awards, championships) and legacy (impact on and off ice, peak dominance) equally high. I rank player ability as the third most important ingredient, as first and foremost as a tie breaker. Hence, I'm not necessarily looking for the better player, as in text book definitions of what a hockey player should be, but for players with the greatest careers and greatest legacies. Therefore the best player is not n…

Top Ten Junior Players Of All Time

Let's take a look at the Top Ten junior players of all time. For the purposes of this list we will at players in the WHL, OHL and QMJHL only.

10. Pat Lafontaine, Verdun, QMJHL Rookie-record 104 goals, 234 points in 1982-83; major junior player of the year.

9. Denis Potvin, Ottawa, OHL 254 games, 95 goals, 234 assists, 329 points. Broke Bobby Orr's junior records.

8. John Tavares, Oshawa, OHL 215 goals, 433 points in 247 games; most goals in OHL history; eligibility rules changed to admit him at 15; 2006 major junior rookie of the year, 2007 major junior player of the year; two world juniors, named 2009 all-star, top forward and MVP.

7. Sidney Crosby, Rimouski, QMJHL 120 goals, 303 points in 121 games; two-time major junior player of the year; silver and gold with Canada at two world juniors.

6. Eric Lindros, Oshawa, OHL 97 goals, 216 points in 95 games; one Memorial Cup victory; three world junior tournaments; major junior player of the year in 1991.

5. Mike Bossy, Laval, Q…

Greatest Hockey Legends: M