Skip to main content

Sochi Last Olympics For NHL?

There has been lots of speculation that the National Hockey League will pull the plug on allowing it's players to participate in the Olympics after 2014.

In fact, it is not even speculation - the writing is definitely on the wall. The NHL is now a $4 billion dollar industry that shuts down for two weeks, loans out its key assets and makes not even a single buck in immediate return. Throw in the fact that the soonest the Olympics may return to North America is 2026, you can't blame the NHL and the NHLPA for looking for better options.

The better option has been discussed at length by the NHL and the NHLPA and that is the return of the World Cup of Hockey. For all it's mismanaged history, the World Cup offers immediate revenue that the Olympics do not. The NHL can reap the television money, the ticket sales and the sponsorship money all to themselves.

But where you can blame the NHL is in lack of seeing the bigger picture. And ultimately the bigger picture means far more money than the World Cup can provide.

Ken Campbell of The Hockey News had some interesting numbers in THN's Olympic preview magazine.
  • Olympic hockey at the Vancouver 2010 Olympics had audiences of 1.5 million viewers in Brazil and 1.6 million in Australia.
  • Canadian television committed 102 hours of hockey coverage in 2010. Italy committed 251.
  • More people around the globe watched Olympic hockey in 2010 than the Super Bowl or UEFA Champions League.
The World Cup will be a nice tournament for hard core hockey fans in North America and in traditional markets in Europe. It will never capture global attention like the Olympics have. The NHL would rather try to milk the same fans of their money rather than tapping into hundreds of millions of new fans in Brazil or Australia or Italy. Surely they can figure out a way of getting t-shirts and jerseys in stores in Melbourne or Venice, could they not? It would take one heck of a die-hard hockey fan in Brazil to even know a World Cup of Hockey game is being played.

Over time winning over new fans worldwide at the Olympics will bring the league so many more riches than going after the short term but sure dollars at the World Cup. It's an easy decision, except for one fact.

Most of the NHL's owners are not interested in the league's fortunes 10+ years from now. Many owners look to flip their investment by then. In fact, by the time the Olympics possibly return to North America in 2026, most of today's owners will have moved on. They want to reap in whatever cash they can now, and then sell their holdings presumably at significantly improved valuation.

Likewise, the NHLPA and by extension the players themselves really aren't that worried about the bigger picture either. As much as the players love participating in the Olympics, they realistically are only interested in financial security of their own generation. That means take the sure thing now - the World Cup - and include it's revenues in the salary cap formula in the immediate future. More quick, sure money means a higher salary cap and bigger contracts now.

It may be highly possible that the Sochi Olympics will be the last featuring NHL players. That would be a huge loss for hockey fans all around the world, whether they are watching from Regina or Rio de Janeiro. 

It would also be a loss for the International Olympic Committee. Losing NHL players in the Winter Olympics' most valuable property would be a huge blow, with loss of sponsorships, ratings and television contract dollars to match. Perhaps the IOC will bend their rigid stranglehold and allow businesses like the NHL and NBA and soccer bodies around the world to share the pie so that everyone can win?

Don't count on it. The IOC lacks the same foresight the NHL does.


Popular posts from this blog

100 Greatest Hockey Players Of All Time

What follows is a listing of the 100 greatest hockey players of all time, in my opinion. As discussed earlier, the definition of greatness is a very personalized endeavor and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
While there is no way of ever truly ranking the top 100 definitively, it is important for the creators of such lists to be open and transparent of how the came to their conclusions. That accountability allows the reader to better understand the process. 

Although admittedly I'm using a completely unscientific formula, I weigh career achievements (era statistics, awards, championships) and legacy (impact on and off ice, peak dominance) equally high. I rank player ability as the third most important ingredient, as first and foremost as a tie breaker. Hence, I'm not necessarily looking for the better player, as in text book definitions of what a hockey player should be, but for players with the greatest careers and greatest legacies. Therefore the best player is not n…

Top Ten Junior Players Of All Time

Let's take a look at the Top Ten junior players of all time. For the purposes of this list we will at players in the WHL, OHL and QMJHL only.

10. Pat Lafontaine, Verdun, QMJHL Rookie-record 104 goals, 234 points in 1982-83; major junior player of the year.

9. Denis Potvin, Ottawa, OHL 254 games, 95 goals, 234 assists, 329 points. Broke Bobby Orr's junior records.

8. John Tavares, Oshawa, OHL 215 goals, 433 points in 247 games; most goals in OHL history; eligibility rules changed to admit him at 15; 2006 major junior rookie of the year, 2007 major junior player of the year; two world juniors, named 2009 all-star, top forward and MVP.

7. Sidney Crosby, Rimouski, QMJHL 120 goals, 303 points in 121 games; two-time major junior player of the year; silver and gold with Canada at two world juniors.

6. Eric Lindros, Oshawa, OHL 97 goals, 216 points in 95 games; one Memorial Cup victory; three world junior tournaments; major junior player of the year in 1991.

5. Mike Bossy, Laval, Q…

Greatest Hockey Legends: M